“Postmodernism cultural forms reflect the dislocation and fragmentation of language communities- splintered into small groups- each speaking a “curious private language of its own, each profession developing its private code or dialect and finally each individual coming to be a linguistic island, separated from everyone else” (PCS 14) (Postmodernism For Beginners 37). People are isolated in small distinct discourses and then eventually these discourses branch out even farther, so people have their own individual opinion just to themselves. People become alienated from their own loved ones. In Cat’s Cradle, Newton Hoeniker writes that when his father won the Nobel Prize his, “Mother cooked a big breakfast. And then when she cleared off the table, she found a quarter and a dime and three pennies by Father’s coffee cup. He’d tipped her” (14). Newton’s father, Dr. Hoeniker, views his wife as a mere waitress who is not really a part of his life. He does not think that she made him breakfast because she loves and is proud of him but because she is obligated to as part of her job. His relationship to his wife is one of a business transaction, where she takes care of him and he brings home the bacon. He feels no love for her. Dr. Hoeniker’s only relationship is with science.
Cat’s Cradle exemplifies the postmodern concept of detachment from family. Dr. Hoeniker fills the void in his life with achieving his goals in science, which become his sole purpose in life. He does not cherish his family because that would distract him from attaining his dreams. His wife and kids are just daily encounters he has like tipping a waitress at a local diner. Dr. Hoeniker is the sole member of his own discourse adhering to his own beliefs that are legitimate to him.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whoooooooooooa! Freakin' loved this blog!!
ReplyDeleteVey interesting and very insightful; I don't know why you don't have more comments!
I hadn't even begun to analyze individual characters (not without the context of some greater, more "relevant" whole in mind), and this was some very insightful insights. You just articulated and supported so clearly what had been only vague opinions floating around at the back of my subconscious. Pure science--knowledge for knowledge's sake--was Dr. Hoeniker sole purpose in life. "Dr. Hoeniker is the sole member of his own discourse adhering to his own beliefs that are legitimate to him." Everything, and everyone, else just fades into the background....
Thanks for a revolutionary read! ;)
Wow! Very insightful blog post Katie. I didn't really think about the whole family thing and detachment. But you have proven with quotes from both books that this is present in the postmodern world. More branches of communication occur because of the way people are brought up or are influenced by. People are a reflection of who and what they are around. The father did have a close relationship with science through his inventions and stuff but did not have a close relationship with his family. His discourse branch was totally different and separate from his family. Great post and it was very interesting. : )
ReplyDelete